MAPUTO, Mozambique, Feb 03 (IPS) – No illusions: Mozambique stays in disaster, regardless of the inauguration of Daniel Chapo as president and the institution of a brand new parliament. Whereas the widespread allegations of large electoral fraud in the course of the elections on 9 October 2024 had been the speedy set off for the unrest, the protests revealed deeply entrenched socio-economic and political grievances.
There’s important frustration over the escalating price of residing, rising inequality, persistent unemployment and lack of high quality public providers — challenges which have outlined Mozambique’s growth path over the previous decade. These socio-economic pressures have fuelled emotions of marginalisation and despair, notably among the many youth and the big group of individuals struggling to make ends meet.
Led by Venâncio Mondlane, the formally recognised runner-up within the presidential election, the protests shortly gained momentum, particularly amongst younger folks. The protesters explicitly rejected the election outcomes and expressed their dissatisfaction with FRELIMO’s 49-year rule, calling for an finish to what they describe as a failed governance mannequin that has perpetuated financial stagnation and political exclusion.
Greater than three months of protests have now handed. The demise toll surpasses 300, with over 600 injured and plenty of nonetheless unaccounted for. Each private and non-private infrastructures have sustained in depth harm. But, the impasse continues. Makes an attempt at dialogue have failed, leaving the nation engulfed in a state of uncertainty.
Two presidents, one divided nation
Mozambique now faces the unprecedented problem of two claimants to the presidency: Chapo, the official head of state, and Mondlane, the self-declared ‘president of the folks’. Each inaugurations have been overshadowed by violence, reflecting a wider development in how dissent is managed within the nation.
FRELIMO’s lengthy historical past of utilizing state safety forces to advance its personal political agenda is clear within the police’s constant and brutal response to protests. Tear fuel, dwell bullets and even house invasions have been deployed, ensuing within the deaths and accidents of uninvolved civilians.
This extreme use of pressure has gone largely unaddressed by Chapo, his predecessor Filipe Nyusi, and senior police officers, reinforcing perceptions of complicity and even direct orchestration within the suppression of opposition.
However the violence shouldn’t be one-sided. Protesters have engaged in sabotage and even launched assaults on police stations, ensuing within the deaths of cops. In some neighbourhoods, protesters went as far as to declare that they might utterly exchange the Polícia da República de Moçambique (PRM) and kind their very own police pressure, additional eroding the authority of the official safety equipment.
Including gas to the hearth, Mondlane just lately introduced a controversial retaliation doctrine: for each protester killed by police, a police officer can be killed in return. It’s ‘a watch for a watch’.
In a defiant bid to undermine Chapo’s authority, Mondlane has embraced a shadow governance mannequin. Issuing what he calls ‘presidential decrees’, he has referred to as for civil disobedience, together with boycotts of toll charges and calls for for value reductions on important items like water, vitality and cement.
His populist measures have struck a chord with many supporters, however their enforcement typically spirals into protests and, at occasions, violence.
In the meantime, Chapo’s administration, nonetheless struggling to kind his authorities, has but to meaningfully tackle the unfolding disaster. In a latest growth, Ana Rita Sithole, a senior determine inside FRELIMO, dismissed the potential of a political settlement with Mondlane, sending a transparent sign {that a} faction inside the social gathering is unwilling to have interaction in dialogue, thereby prolonging the standoff and undermining any prospect of restoring peace. This tough-line place solely deepens the political divide, casting a shadow over Mozambique’s already fragile future.
Escalation and authoritarianism or stability and dialogue?
Mozambique’s unsure future is dominated by two doable situations — one in all escalation, the opposite of reconciliation and a return to stability. The potential for dialogue stands because the decisive issue separating these two trajectories. Nonetheless, progress in fostering such dialogue has thus far been disappointingly restricted.
Within the first situation, instability deepens as each side entrench their positions. On this situation, Mondlane continues to rally civil disobedience, protests and mass mobilisation, additional eroding Chapo’s skill to control successfully. Confronted with mounting stress, Chapo may comply with the repressive path of his predecessor Nyusi, more and more relying on police crackdowns and state safety forces to claim management.
Whereas these measures could also be geared toward restoring order, they danger inflaming tensions additional. Each act of repression may provoke stronger resistance from opposition supporters, doubtlessly spiralling right into a harmful cycle of violence and escalating unrest.
Political persecution may intensify, focusing on distinguished opposition figures, journalists and activists. In an excessive situation, this might even consequence within the assassination or imprisonment of key opposition leaders equivalent to Mondlane himself, sparking additional outrage amongst his supporters and deepening societal divisions.
This trajectory is neither new nor distinctive. Different nations going through post-electoral crises have travelled comparable roads of elevated repression and authoritarianism. Zimbabwe after its 2008 elections, Ethiopia after 2005, Venezuela in 2018 and Russia in 2011 are stark examples. Whereas such measures could provide short-term management, they finally show unsustainable, resulting in extended instability or deeper authoritarian rule.
Mozambique now faces an analogous danger, with police brutality towards protesters reaching alarming and unacceptable ranges. This intensification of repression underscores the pressing want for a brand new, extra inclusive and fewer militaristic method to handle the disaster.
A second, extra optimistic situation hinges on a return to dialogue. Real engagement between Chapo, Mondlane and key societal stakeholders – together with civil society, spiritual leaders and lecturers – may defuse tensions and restore belief in governance.
Sadly, efforts to provoke dialogue have thus far encountered substantial setbacks. Former President Nyusi made an early try by inviting Mondlane to the desk, however the latter’s preconditions – primarily associated to his security – weren’t addressed, resulting in his absence from the talks.
Subsequent discussions included Chapo and representatives from a number of opposition events, equivalent to Ossufo Momade (RENAMO), Lutero Simango (MDM), Albino Forquilha (Podemos) and Salomão Muchanga (Nova Democracia), however Mondlane’s continued absence restricted their scope and effectiveness.
When Mondlane ultimately returned to Mozambique initially of this month, there was hypothesis about doable conferences with different opposition leaders, however these talks by no means materialised. In his inaugural speech, Chapo himself harassed the necessity for ‘frank, sincere and honest’ dialogue, calling it a precedence for political and social stability.
But, almost two weeks after assuming workplace, there have been no studies of any substantial dialogue initiatives, and Chapo publicly denied the existence of any ongoing negotiations.
For this situation to succeed, Chapo, because the president of the Republic, should take decisive motion and leverage his management place to construct consensus for the great of the nation. On the identical time, Mondlane should reveal openness for a negotiated answer to the battle and rethink his record of calls for, notably since his battle for ‘electoral fact’ appears troublesome to win after the constitutional court docket processed the complaints and formally decided the ultimate outcomes.
Though extra critical now, Mozambique’s present impasse mirrors the tensions that adopted the 2009 elections. As then, there’s reluctance to have interaction in significant dialogue. Sadly, that earlier deadlock ultimately gave approach to armed confrontations between RENAMO, the most important opposition social gathering on the time, and the FRELIMO authorities.
To stop historical past from repeating itself, leaders have to do greater than make symbolic gestures; the state of affairs requires genuine, inclusive engagement that amplifies the voices of all — together with opposition leaders and civil society. Solely by changing entrenched divisions with honest dialogue can the nation break away from its cycle of battle and work towards a steady, democratic future.
Egídio Chaimite is a Senior Researcher at IESE in Mozambique, specialising in governance, elections, human rights and social actions. With in depth publications and expertise in programme design, implementation and analysis, he additionally teaches electoral administration and public coverage at high Mozambican universities.
Supply: Worldwide Politics and Society (IPS), printed by the World and European Coverage Unit of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Hiroshimastrasse 28, D-10785 Berlin.
IPS UN Bureau
© Inter Press Service (2025) — All Rights ReservedAuthentic supply: Inter Press Service
