A males’s rights activist Kish Siff just lately shared screenshots on the social media platform X, displaying his dialog with a possible match. The interplay took a tense flip when the lady realized his wage was Rs 3 lakhs per yr, not Rs 30 lakhs as she initially thought.
At first, the lady was eager on an early engagement, however when Siff requested for extra time to construct the connection, noting that it will be their second marriage, she responded, โCanโt wait or we discover different match.โ Ultimately, Siff agreed to a mid-November engagement however later clarified {that a} typo had confused his precise wage.
After studying the reality, the lady reacted angrily, utilizing offensive language that Siff selected to not disclose. Following their argument, Siff claimed he did a background examine, discovering that she had accepted an Rs 80 lakh settlement in a earlier case towards her in-laws. He remarked, โCame upon by way of verification… she took Rs 80 lakhs to settle a false 498A case. She informed me fabricated tales, saying she hadnโt taken any cash throughout her divorce.โ
The scenario intensified when Siff shared messages from the ladyโs mom, who threatened to file a police grievance accusing him of fraud. The momโs messages underscored the intense battle surrounding the connection.
The incident sparked widespread dialogue on-line. Many social media customers criticized what they noticed as a โgold diggerโ mindset in some marriage contexts, whereas others recommended Siff for highlighting potential points with honesty on matrimonial web sites.
“Lesson: change into a lawyer earlier than getting married,” a consumer commented. One other consumer mentioned, “Did she let you know that her daughter is divorced? Discuss fraud being of their blood.”
“The truth that she is feeling proud that they duped their ex son in legislation reveals how felony these ladies are,” a 3rd consumer mentioned.
A fourth consumer mentioned, “Such households ought to be put behind bars, else they might smash some or the opposite household.”
