It’s been a superb couple of weeks for well-known songwriters preventing off lawsuits accusing them of copyright infringement. First Mariah Carey beat a long-running swimsuit accusing her of ripping off components of her enduring smash All I Need For Christmas Is You.
Now, information breaks that Dua Lipa has been victorious in one other landmark case, this time pertaining to her megahit, Levitating.
A federal decide in New York has dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit in opposition to the Warner Information-signed act, ruling that Levitating, launched in 2020, didn’t illegally copy a 1979 disco tune.
In an opinion and order issued Thursday (March 27), U.S. District Decide Katherine Polk Failla granted abstract judgment in favor of Lipa and her co-defendants, discovering that the plaintiffs didn’t exhibit substantial similarity between protectable components of the works.
These co-defendants included all three main music firms – as Sony Music Publishing (US) LLC; Common Music Company; and Warner Information Inc – plus Lipa’s Levitating co-writers, Clarence Espresso, Jr., Sarah Hudson, and Stephen Kozmeniuk.
The lawsuit, filed by Larball Publishing Firm and Sandy Linzer Productions, alleged that Levitating infringed on their copyrights for 2 songs: Wiggle and Giggle All Night time, a 1979 disco tune recorded by Cory Daye, and Don Diablo, a 1980 tune by Miguel Bosé that the plaintiffs had acquired rights to by way of a earlier infringement settlement.
(MBW has obtained Decide Failla’s order and you may learn it in full right here.)
Decide Finds No Protectable Similarity
Decide Failla decided that the musical phrase shared by Levitating and the plaintiffs’ works amounted to “5 groupings of repeated sixteenth notes descending on a B minor scale in Levitating however on a D main scale in Don Diablo“.
The courtroom concluded that this descending scale, together with one further observe that plaintiffs argued created a “signature melody”, weren’t protectable beneath copyright legislation.
“The Courtroom in the end concludes that there might be no substantial similarity (and thus no copyright violation) as a matter of legislation, as a result of ‘the similarity between [the] works issues solely non-copyrightable components of the [P]laintiff[s’] work,’” Decide Failla wrote.
Ed Sheeran Precedent Strengthened Lipa’s Case
The ruling closely relied on the Second Circuit’s latest resolution in Structured Asset Gross sales, LLC v. Sheeran, which seems to have been pivotal for Lipa’s protection.
That precedent-setting case, which Ed Sheeran gained in November 2024, established that “primary musical constructing blocks like notes, rhythms, and chords are typically not copyrightable,” although a “work consisting of unprotectable components should still be protectable as an unique ‘choice and association’ of these components.”
The Sheeran resolution offered a robust authorized framework that instantly benefited Lipa’s protection, as Decide Failla explicitly cited it when rejecting the plaintiff’s claims {that a} descending scale plus one further observe might represent protectable expression.
Plaintiffs’ Arguments Rejected
The plaintiffs had tried to argue that further components, together with the “patter model” of singing, the “pop with a disco really feel” musical model, tempo, and different traits made the mixture protectable.
Nonetheless, the courtroom rejected this principle, noting it had been launched too late within the proceedings and, extra importantly, that these further components “lack enough originality alone, or as mixed” to be protectable beneath copyright legislation.
Decide Failla identified that a number of of the claimed components had been commonplace compositional components, with proof displaying the “patter model” has been used “for hundreds of years” in operas by Mozart and Rossini and operettas by Gilbert and Sullivan.
“Extra basically, the Courtroom finds {that a} musical model, outlined by Plaintiffs as ‘pop with a disco really feel,’ and a musical operate, outlined by Plaintiffs to incorporate ‘leisure and dancing,’ can’t probably be protectable — alone or in tandem — as a result of to carry in any other case could be to utterly foreclose the additional growth of music in that style or for that goal,” the ruling acknowledged.
The courtroom additionally dismissed the plaintiffs’ spinoff claims for declaratory reduction and accounting, which that they had acknowledged could be rendered moot if the copyright infringement declare failed.
This lawsuit dismissal marks the conclusion of one in all a number of authorized challenges Dua Lipa has confronted over Levitating.
In 2022, a band referred to as Artikal Sound System alleged that Levitating was “considerably related” to their observe Stay Your Life.
That case was dismissed by a federal courtroom decide who dominated that Artikal Sound System failed to offer proof that Levitating‘s creators had entry to their tune.
In a separate ongoing case, producer Bosko Kante sued Lipa, WMG and producer Stephen Kozmeniuk in 2023, alleging {that a} talkbox recording he made was used with out permission on three remixes of Levitating.
In September 2024, Decide Hernan D. Vera of the U.S. District Courtroom for the Central District of California denied a movement to dismiss that case, permitting it to proceed.
Music Enterprise Worldwide
